Showing posts with label Minnesota. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Minnesota. Show all posts

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Minnesota Appeals Court Expungement Ruling Good for Employment Prospects

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

May 03, 2012 /24-7PressRelease/ -- A serious criminal conviction can be a challenging thing to live with. Even long after repaying your debt to society, your past can come back to haunt you, impairing your ability to get a good job, obtain a professional license or find suitable housing.

Yet, under certain circumstances, Minnesota law allows individuals to expunge their old criminal convictions. In fact, a new appellate ruling issued by the Court of Appeals on Apr. 12, 2012, makes expungement even more readily available for Minnesotans.

Court Deemed to Have Authority to Expunge Both Judicial and Executive Records

Five years after pleading guilty to a felony charge of aggravated forgery, the respondent in the case State v. M.D.T. was eager to move on with her life. She had originally filed an expungement petition pro se -- in other words, without the help of a lawyer -- but it was denied. However, her second expungement petition, submitted with the help of a Minnesota criminal expungement attorney, was approved by a district court.

Still, the judgment was not final. Along with the county attorney involved in the case, Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson appealed the ruling, claiming that the district court overstepped its authority by ordering the expungement of the respondent's criminal records, putting the case in the hands of the Court of Appeals.

In Minnesota, there is no guarantee of expungement, but if your crime is not among the most serious offenses, and you can convince a judge that you have been disadvantaged by your criminal record, sealing your criminal record will not adversely affect public safety, and you have rehabilitated yourself, you have a good chance at expungement.

On appeal, the court found that the respondent had met these requirements, but there was still a question of whether the original trial court had the authority to expunge not just the criminal records maintained by the judicial branch, but also those held by executive branch authorities like the BCA (Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension).

The appellate court reasoned that since the executive branch maintains criminal records as the result of judicial branch action (i.e., entering a conviction) that Courts should be able to expunge executive branch records created by the Courts themselves. In addition, executive branch records need to be sealed for a judicial expungement order to be meaningful, and there are practical protections still built in that allow executive records to be reopened for good cause. Thus, the court was within its authority to expunge all the respondent's criminal records, both judicial and executive.

Career Derailed By Criminal Record? Expungement May Be the Answer

A felony conviction can be devastating for employment prospects. In the recent appellate case, before her expungement, the respondent was denied a job by at least six prospective employers due to her felony conviction -- she was even fired from a position she'd already obtained when her past came up in a background check. Thankfully, the recent ruling should help get her career back on track.

The ruling may be helpful for you too. If you have a conviction in your past, contact a Minnesota criminal expungement attorney today to learn how to clear your record of old legal indiscretions.

Article provided by Max A Keller Atty at Law
Visit us at www.kellerlawoffices.com

---
Press release service and press release distribution provided by http://www.24-7pressrelease.com

# # #

Read more Press Releases from FL Web Advantage:


View the original article here



Minnesota DWI Testing Still Questionable in Wake of Source Code Issues

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

May 03, 2012 /24-7PressRelease/ -- Most drunk driving cases are built almost completely around the results of chemical alcohol testing. But what happens when the science behind the testing is flawed?

For years, the machine primarily used to detect breath alcohol content in Minnesota was the Intoxilyzer 5000. However, numerous errors became evident in the Intoxilyzer 5000's source code (the internal computer code upon which the device is completely reliant). Now, law enforcement authorities are moving away from the Intoxilyzer 5000 -- but many DWI cases have nonetheless been left in limbo, and alternative alcohol testing methods, such as Urine Testing for DWI's, have also failed to withstand scientific scrutiny.

Source Code Questions Lead Into Urine Testing Deficiencies

Source code or Software issues have plagued the Intoxilyzer 5000 for years; Minnesota DWI defense attorneys challenged the use of the Intoxilyzer 5000, arguing it did not always provide accurate breath alcohol content results. For business reasons, the manufacturer of the Intoxilyzer 5000, CMI, would not release the source code for analysis, adding to the confusion. After years of legal wrangling, a Minnesota judge finally ruled that despite the alleged source code problems, the Intoxilyzer 5000 expressed an accurate numerical representation of alcohol content as derived from breath testing. That ruling has now been appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which may issue its Source Code appeal ruling at any time.

Yet, despite the judicial ruling upholding the general accuracy of the Intoxilyzer 5000, the damage has been done. Thousands of DWI cases were left in limbo, and police tacitly acknowledged problems with the Intoxilyzer 5000 by switching to alternative means of alcohol testing.

Breath tests are still used to test alcohol levels, but law enforcement officers now typically rely on testing devices, like the Datamaster, from a new manufacturer when conducting breath tests. Additionally, urine testing has become more popular following the source code debacle -- but urine testing for DWI is not accurate in Minnesota.

As your body processes alcohol, it is deposited in your bladder to be discharged as waste in your urine. The alcohol sits in the bladder undisturbed until it is released, even as the alcohol concentration in your blood drops. If you have been drinking and have not urinated in some time, alcohol pools in the bladder and the first urine sample you provide will make you blood alcohol content appear far higher than it is in reality. This "first void" sample is often used by law enforcement authorities in Minnesota who ask you to provide a urine sample as soon as you are arrested. The test results that follow may put your alcohol content over the legal limit when at present you are, in fact, far from impaired.

Fight Your Minnesota DWI Charge

Don't let faulty DWI chemical test results land you in a world of legal trouble. If you've been pulled over for drunk driving, contact a Minnesota DWI defense attorney today and get the help you need in challenging ineffectual test results.

Article provided by Keller Law Offices
Visit us at www.dwi-legal.com

---
Press release service and press release distribution provided by http://www.24-7pressrelease.com

# # #

Read more Press Releases from FL Web Advantage:


View the original article here